When does regression discontinuity design work? Evidence from random election outcomes

DOI10.3982/QE864MaRDI QIDQ4586370zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Ari Hyytinen, Jaakko Meriläinen, Tuukka Saarimaa, Otto Toivanen, Janne Tukiainen

Publication date 13 September 2018

Published in Quantitative Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.3982/qe864

zbMATH Keywords

close electionsexperimentincumbency advantageregression discontinuity design

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to social sciences (62P25)

Recommendations

• Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections
• Regression discontinuity designs: a guide to practice
• Regression discontinuity inference with specification error
• Editorial. Special issue editors' introduction: The regression discontinuity design -- theory and applications
• Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: a density test

Cited in

(10)

• Optimizing the tie-breaker regression discontinuity design
• Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections
• Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: a density test
• Approximate permutation tests and induced order statistics in the regression discontinuity design
• Simple local polynomial density estimators
• Extrapolating Treatment Effects in Multi-Cutoff Regression Discontinuity Designs
• A guide to regression discontinuity designs in medical applications
• Ties
• Better nonparametric confidence intervals via robust bias correction for quantile regression
• A unified test for regression discontinuity designs

This page was built for publication: When does regression discontinuity design work? Evidence from random election outcomes

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4586370)