Closure operators, frames and neatest representations
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4589153
Abstract: Given a poset and a standard closure operator we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the lattice of -closed sets of to be a frame in terms of the recursive construction of the -closure of sets. We use this condition to show that given a set of distinguished joins from , the lattice of -ideals of fails to be a frame if and only if it fails to be -distributive, with depending on the cardinalities of sets in . From this we deduce that if a poset has the property that whenever is defined for it is necessarily equal to , then it has an -representation. This answers a question from the literature.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A Representation Theory for Prime and Implicative Semilattices
- Boolean Rings with Isomorphisms Preserving Suprema and Infima
- Closure
- Distributive partially ordered sets
- Distributivity in semilattices
- Each join-completion of a partially ordered set in the solution of a universal problem
- Embedding ordered sets into distributive lattices
- No finite axiomatizations for posets embeddable into distributive lattices
- On congruence lattices of lattices
- On separation properties in semilattices
- On the definition of distributive semilattices
- REPRESENTATION OF POSETS
- Representable posets
- Representation of partially ordered sets
- Standard completions for quasiordered sets
- The class of prime semilattices is not finitely axiomatizable
- Universal and internal properties of some completions of k-join-semilattices and k-join-distributive partially ordered sets.
- Universal and internal properties of some extensions of partially orderd sets.
- Weakly distributive semilattices
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Closure operators, frames and neatest representations
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4589153)