Closure operators, frames and neatest representations

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4589153

DOI10.1017/S0004972717000314zbMATH Open1423.06013arXiv1702.02257MaRDI QIDQ4589153FDOQ4589153


Authors: Robert Egrot Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 7 November 2017

Published in: Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Given a poset P and a standard closure operator Gamma:wp(P)owp(P) we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the lattice of Gamma-closed sets of wp(P) to be a frame in terms of the recursive construction of the Gamma-closure of sets. We use this condition to show that given a set mathcalU of distinguished joins from P, the lattice of mathcalU-ideals of P fails to be a frame if and only if it fails to be sigma-distributive, with sigma depending on the cardinalities of sets in mathcalU. From this we deduce that if a poset has the property that whenever awedge(bveec) is defined for a,b,cinP it is necessarily equal to (awedgeb)vee(awedgec), then it has an (omega,3)-representation. This answers a question from the literature.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.02257




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (3)





This page was built for publication: Closure operators, frames and neatest representations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4589153)