A formula goes to court: partisan gerrymandering and the efficiency gap
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4596065
Abstract: Recently, a proposal has been advanced to detect unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering with a simple formula called the efficiency gap. The efficiency gap is now working its way towards a possible landmark case in the Supreme Court. This note explores some of its mathematical properties in light of the fact that it reduces to a straight proportional comparison of votes to seats. Though we offer several critiques, we assess that EG can still be a useful component of a courtroom analysis. But a famous formula can take on a life of its own and this one will need to be watched closely.
Recommendations
Cited in
(12)- Fair redistricting is hard
- Geometry in the courtroom
- An impossibility theorem for gerrymandering
- Partisan gerrymandering with geographically compact districts
- Measuring political gerrymandering
- Measuring partisan fairness
- Geometry, inference, complexity, and democracy
- Redistricting optimization with recombination: a local search case study
- Padding and pruning: gerrymandering under turnout heterogeneity
- How effective is the efficiency gap?
- Book review of: I. Volić, Making democracy count: how mathematics improves voting, electoral maps, and representation
- To split or not to split the US ninth circuit court of appeals: a simple statistical argument, counterargument, and critique
This page was built for publication: A formula goes to court: partisan gerrymandering and the efficiency gap
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4596065)