A comparison of bivariate, multivariate random-effects, and Poisson correlated gamma-frailty models to meta-analyze individual patient data of ordinal scale diagnostic tests
DOI10.1002/BIMJ.201600184zbMATH Open1379.62085OpenAlexW2729080470WikidataQ38686266 ScholiaQ38686266MaRDI QIDQ4597941FDOQ4597941
Authors: Gabrielle Simoneau, Brooke Levis, Pim Cuijpers, John P. A. Ioannidis, Scott B. Patten, Ian Shrier, Charles H. Bombardier, Flavia de Lima Osório, Jesse R. Fann, Dwenda Gjerdingen, Femke Lamers, Manote Lotrakul, Bernd Löwe, Juwita Shaaban, Lesley Stafford, Henk C. P. M. van Weert, Mary A. Whooley, Karin A. Wittkampf, Albert S. Yeung, Brett D. Thombs, Andrea Benedetti 
Publication date: 14 December 2017
Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://research.vu.nl/ws/files/26039194/2016_Simoneau_Biometr_J_comparison_of_methods_IPD_MAs_diagnostic_tests.pdf
Recommendations
- Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds using survival methods
- Performance measures of the bivariate random effects model for meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy
- Bivariate random‐effects meta‐analysis models for diagnostic test accuracy studies using arcsine‐based transformations
- A population‐averaged approach to diagnostic test meta‐analysis
- A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
meta-analysismultiple thresholdsindividual patient dataordinal diagnostic testPoisson correlated frailty
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: A comparison of bivariate, multivariate random-effects, and Poisson correlated gamma-frailty models to meta-analyze individual patient data of ordinal scale diagnostic tests
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4597941)
