Dense subset sum may be the hardest

From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:4601865)



Abstract: The Subset Sum problem asks whether a given set of n positive integers contains a subset of elements that sum up to a given target t. It is an outstanding open question whether the O∗(2n/2)-time algorithm for Subset Sum by Horowitz and Sahni [J. ACM 1974] can be beaten in the worst-case setting by a "truly faster", O∗(2(0.5−delta)n)-time algorithm, with some constant delta>0. Continuing an earlier work [STACS 2015], we study Subset Sum parameterized by the maximum bin size , defined as the largest number of subsets of the n input integers that yield the same sum. For every epsilon>0 we give a truly faster algorithm for instances with , as well as instances with . Consequently, we also obtain a characterization in terms of the popular density parameter n/log2t: if all instances of density at least 1.003 admit a truly faster algorithm, then so does every instance. This goes against the current intuition that instances of density 1 are the hardest, and therefore is a step toward answering the open question in the affirmative. Our results stem from novel combinations of earlier algorithms for Subset Sum and a study of an extremal question in additive combinatorics connected to the problem of Uniquely Decodable Code Pairs in information theory.












This page was built for publication: Dense subset sum may be the hardest

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4601865)