On the number of lambda terms with prescribed size of their de Bruijn representation

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4601892

DOI10.4230/LIPICS.STACS.2016.40zbMATH Open1434.03051arXiv1509.06139OpenAlexW2963632202MaRDI QIDQ4601892FDOQ4601892


Authors: Bernhard Gittenberger, Zbigniew Gołȩbiewski Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 24 January 2018

Abstract: John Tromp introduced the so-called 'binary lambda calculus' as a way to encode lambda terms in terms of binary words. Later, Grygiel and Lescanne conjectured that the number of binary lambda terms with m free indices and of size n (encoded as binary words of length n) is o(n3/2aun) for auapprox1.963448ldots. We generalize the proposed notion of size and show that for several classes of lambda terms, including binary lambda terms with m free indices, the number of terms of size n is Theta(n3/2hon) with some class dependent constant ho, which in particular disproves the above mentioned conjecture. A way to obtain lower and upper bounds for the constant near the leading term is presented and numerical results for a few previously introduced classes of lambda terms are given.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.06139




Recommendations





Cited In (8)





This page was built for publication: On the number of lambda terms with prescribed size of their de Bruijn representation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4601892)