Preferential attachment graphs with co-existing types of different fitnesses
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4611282
Abstract: We extend the work of Antunovi'{c}, Mossel and R'{a}cz on competing types in preferential attachment models to include cases where the types have different fitnesses, which may be either multiplicative or additive. We will show that, depending on the values of the parameters of the models, there are different possible limiting behaviours depending on the zeros of a certain function. In particular we will show the existence of choices of the parameters where one type is favoured both by having higher fitness and by the type attachment mechanism, but the other type has a positive probability of dominating the network in the limit.
Recommendations
- Coexistence in preferential attachment networks
- Dynamical fitness models: evidence of universality classes for preferential attachment graphs
- Robust analysis of preferential attachment models with fitness
- A phase transition for preferential attachment models with additive fitness
- Preferential attachment with fitness: unfolding the condensate
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5485446 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1405930 (Why is no real title available?)
- A self-equilibrium Friedman-like urn via stochastic approximation
- A survey of random processes with reinforcement
- Asymptotic behavior and distributional limits of preferential attachment graphs
- Coexistence in preferential attachment networks
- Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
- Growing random networks with fitness
- Multiple drawing multi-colour urns by stochastic approximation
- Non-convergence of proportions of types in a preferential attachment graph with three co-existing types
- Popularity based random graph models leading to a scale-free degree sequence
- The degree sequences and spectra of scale-free random graphs
- Two-color balanced affine urn models with multiple drawings
Cited in
(7)- Dynamical fitness models: evidence of universality classes for preferential attachment graphs
- Coexistence in preferential attachment networks
- Non-convergence of proportions of types in a preferential attachment graph with three co-existing types
- Fragility of nonconvergence in preferential attachment graphs with three types
- Degree distributions in recursive trees with fitnesses
- Birds of a feather or opposites attract -- effects in network modelling
- Condensation phenomena in preferential attachment trees with neighbourhood influence
This page was built for publication: Preferential attachment graphs with co-existing types of different fitnesses
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4611282)
