Assessing moderated mediation in linear models requires fewer confounding assumptions than assessing mediation

DOI10.1111/BMSP.12077zbMATH Open1406.91369OpenAlexW2528477889WikidataQ39315889 ScholiaQ39315889MaRDI QIDQ4614734FDOQ4614734

Authors: Tom Loeys, Wouter Talloen, Liesbet Goubert, Beatrijs Moerkerke, Stijn Vansteelandt 

Publication date: 31 January 2019

Published in: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12077

Recommendations

• Assessing mediation in simple and complex models
• A comparison of approaches to interval estimation of mediated effects in linear regression models
• Least square estimation of mediating effects with confounding variables
• Maximum likelihood analysis of linear mediation models with treatment-mediator interaction
• Robust inference for mediated effects in partially linear models
• Marginal log-linear models and mediation analysis
• Confounding in the estimation of mediation effects
• A simpler approach for mediation analysis for dichotomous mediators in logistic regression
• Moderating effects of subgroups in linear models
• Multilevel mediation analysis with structured unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding

zbMATH Keywords

mediationconfoundingmoderationmoderated mediation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Measurement and performance in psychology (91E45)

Cited In (3)

• Multilevel mediation analysis with structured unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding
• Moderating effects of subgroups in linear models
• Assessing mediation in simple and complex models

This page was built for publication: Assessing moderated mediation in linear models requires fewer confounding assumptions than assessing mediation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4614734)