Assessing moderated mediation in linear models requires fewer confounding assumptions than assessing mediation

DOI10.1111/BMSP.12077MaRDI QIDQ4614734zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Tom Loeys, Wouter Talloen, Liesbet Goubert, Beatrijs Moerkerke, Stijn Vansteelandt

Publication date 31 January 2019

Published in British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12077

zbMATH Keywords

mediationconfoundingmoderationmoderated mediation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Measurement and performance in psychology (91E45)

Recommendations

• Assessing mediation in simple and complex models
• A comparison of approaches to interval estimation of mediated effects in linear regression models
• Least square estimation of mediating effects with confounding variables
• Maximum likelihood analysis of linear mediation models with treatment-mediator interaction
• Robust inference for mediated effects in partially linear models
• Marginal log-linear models and mediation analysis
• Confounding in the estimation of mediation effects
• A simpler approach for mediation analysis for dichotomous mediators in logistic regression
• Moderating effects of subgroups in linear models
• Multilevel mediation analysis with structured unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding

Cited in

(3)

• Moderating effects of subgroups in linear models
• Multilevel mediation analysis with structured unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding
• Assessing mediation in simple and complex models

This page was built for publication: Assessing moderated mediation in linear models requires fewer confounding assumptions than assessing mediation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4614734)