No proof nets for MLL with units: proof equivalence in MLL is PSPACE-complete

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4635635

DOI10.1145/2603088.2603126zbMATH Open1395.03036arXiv1510.06178OpenAlexW2128713292MaRDI QIDQ4635635FDOQ4635635


Authors: Willem Heijltjes, Robin Houston Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 23 April 2018

Published in: Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS) (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: MLL proof equivalence is the problem of deciding whether two proofs in multiplicative linear logic are related by a series of inference permutations. It is also known as the word problem for star-autonomous categories. Previous work has shown the problem to be equivalent to a rewiring problem on proof nets, which are not canonical for full MLL due to the presence of the two units. Drawing from recent work on reconfiguration problems, in this paper it is shown that MLL proof equivalence is PSPACE-complete, using a reduction from Nondeterministic Constraint Logic. An important consequence of the result is that the existence of a satisfactory notion of proof nets for MLL with units is ruled out (under current complexity assumptions). The PSPACE-hardness result extends to equivalence of normal forms in MELL without units, where the weakening rule for the exponentials induces a similar rewiring problem.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.06178




Recommendations





Cited In (16)





This page was built for publication: No proof nets for MLL with units: proof equivalence in MLL is PSPACE-complete

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4635635)