Locality estimates for Fresnel-wave-propagation and stability of X-ray phase contrast imaging with finite detectors
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4646398
DOI10.1088/1361-6420/AAE78FzbMATH Open1408.92012arXiv1805.06185OpenAlexW3106294202MaRDI QIDQ4646398FDOQ4646398
Authors: Simon Maretzke 
Publication date: 14 January 2019
Published in: Inverse Problems (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Coherent wave-propagation in the near-field Fresnel-regime is the underlying contrast-mechanism to (propagation-based) X-ray phase contrast imaging (XPCI), an emerging lensless technique that enables 2D- and 3D-imaging of biological soft tissues and other light-element samples down to nanometer-resolutions. Mathematically, propagation is described by the Fresnel-propagator, a convolution with an arbitrarily non-local kernel. As real-world detectors may only capture a finite field-of-view, this non-locality implies that the recorded diffraction-patterns are necessarily incomplete. This raises the question of stability of image-reconstruction from the truncated data -- even if the complex-valued wave-field, and not just its modulus, could be measured. Contrary to the latter restriction of the acquisition, known as the phase-problem, the finite-detector-problem has not received much attention in literature. The present work therefore analyzes locality of Fresnel-propagation in order to establish stability of XPCI with finite detectors. Image-reconstruction is shown to be severely ill-posed in this setting -- even without a phase-problem. However, quantitative estimates of the leaked wave-field reveal that Lipschitz-stability holds down to a sharp resolution limit that depends on the detector-size and varies within the field-of-view. The smallest resolvable lengthscale is found to be 1/F times the detector's aspect length, where F is the Fresnel number associated with the latter scale. The stability results are extended to phaseless imaging in the linear contrast-transfer-function regime.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.06185
Recommendations
- Stability estimates for linearized near-field phase retrieval in X-ray phase contrast imaging
- Inverse problems in propagation-based X-ray phase contrast imaging and tomography: stability analysis and reconstruction methods
- A uniqueness result for propagation-based phase contrast imaging from a single measurement
- Geometry of the phase retrieval problem
- An analytic method of phase retrieval for X-ray phase contrast imaging
Cites Work
- The uncertainty principle: A mathematical survey
- Some comments on Fourier analysis, uncertainty and modeling
- On the asymptotic convergence of B-spline wavelets to Gabor functions
- Lipschitz stability for the inverse conductivity problem
- Coherent X-ray optics
- Phase contrast tomography using holographic measurements
- Inverse boundary value problem for the Helmholtz equation: quantitative conditional Lipschitz stability estimates
- B-spline generated frames
- Optical physics
- Stability estimates for linearized near-field phase retrieval in X-ray phase contrast imaging
- A uniqueness result for propagation-based phase contrast imaging from a single measurement
- Three-dimensional propagation in near-field tomographic X-ray phase retrieval
- Three-dimensional single-cell imaging with X-ray waveguides in the holographic regime
Cited In (4)
- Editorial: Inverse wave propagation problems without phase information
- Inverse problems in propagation-based X-ray phase contrast imaging and tomography: stability analysis and reconstruction methods
- Stability estimates for linearized near-field phase retrieval in X-ray phase contrast imaging
- Total variation-based reconstruction and phase retrieval for diffraction tomography
This page was built for publication: Locality estimates for Fresnel-wave-propagation and stability of X-ray phase contrast imaging with finite detectors
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4646398)
