Recommendations
Cited in
(41)- Assessing the value of data for prediction policies: the case of antibiotic prescribing
- An algorithm for removing sensitive information: application to race-independent recidivism prediction
- Optimal randomized classification trees
- Decision making with limited feedback: error bounds for predictive policing and recidivism prediction
- Algorithms as discrimination detectors
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7064055 (Why is no real title available?)
- Imposing commitment to rein in overconfidence in learning
- Generalizing group fairness in machine learning via utilities
- Presidential address: Demand-side constraints in development. The role of market size, trade, and (in)equality
- Learning decision catalogues for situated decision making: the case of scoring systems
- Preference learning and multiple criteria decision aiding: differences, commonalities, and synergies. II
- Text Selection
- Hiring as exploration
- Fairness in Machine Learning: A Review for Statisticians
- Measuring and mitigating racial disparities in tax audits
- Forks over knives: predictive inconsistency in criminal justice algorithmic risk assessment tools
- Working with AI: an analysis for rational integration
- Identifying prediction mistakes in observational data
- Refining public policies with machine learning: the case of tax auditing
- Authors' reply to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment'
- Priyantha Wijayatunga's contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to the pretrial safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Tyler VanderWeele's contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Kuldeep Kumar's contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human-decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Victor Richmond Jose's contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Jane Luise Hutton's contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Eugenie Hunsicker's contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Efrén Cruz Cortés and Debashis Ghosh's contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human-decision making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Mats Stensrud, Vanessa Didelez and Aaron Sarvet's contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Aaron Sarvet and Mats Stensrud's contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Pier Luigi Conti's contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Peng Ding's contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Andre Python's contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Seconder of the vote of thanks and contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Proposer of the vote of thanks and contribution to the discussion of `Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment' by Imai et al.
- Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: application to pretrial public safety assessment
- Closer than they appear: a Bayesian perspective on individual-level heterogeneity in risk assessment
- Beyond incompatibility: trade-offs between mutually exclusive fairness criteria in machine learning and law
- Statistical inference of optimal allocations. I: Regularities and their implications
- Blessing from Human-AI Interaction: Super Policy Learning in Confounded Environments
- Binary choice under asymmetric loss in a data-rich environment: theory and an application to algorithmic fairness
- Mathematical optimization in classification and regression trees
This page was built for publication: Human decisions and machine predictions
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4647455)
