Trapped Reeb orbits do not imply periodic ones
A theorem by \textit{Y. Eliashberg} and \textit{H. Hofer} [Differ. Integral Equ. 7, No. 5--6, 1303--1324 (1994; Zbl 0803.58045)] states that any contact form \(\alpha\) on \(\mathbb R^3\) which equals the standard form outside a compact set and whose Reeb vector field does not have any periodic orbits, is diffeomorphic to the standard one. In terms of the Reeb vector field, this is equivalent to say that if the Reeb vector field of \(\alpha\) has a trapped orbit, then it also has a periodic orbit. H. Hofer conjectured the higher-dimensional analogue of this result, but in this paper the authors disprove that conjecture by an example.
- Reeb orbits trapped by Denjoy minimal sets
- Periodic orbits from nonperiodic orbits on an interval
- Reeb's theorem and periodic orbits for a rotating Hénon-Heiles potential
- From a Reeb orbit trap to a Hamiltonian plug
- On periodic orbits of trapezoid maps
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1567952
- Periodic orbits in the case of a zero eigenvalue
- Non-contractible periodic orbits in Hamiltonian dynamics on tori
- Compact orbits and periodicity
- Non-Birkhoff Periodic Orbits in a Circle Map
- Finsler geodesics, periodic Reeb orbits, and open books
- The singular Weinstein conjecture
- Diffeomorphism type via aperiodicity in Reeb dynamics
- Controlled Reeb dynamics -- three lectures not in Cala Gonone
- From a Reeb orbit trap to a Hamiltonian plug
- Reeb orbits trapped by Denjoy minimal sets
- Existence of periodic orbits in Riemannian and contact geometry
- Diffeomorphism type via aperiodicity in Reeb dynamics
- Do overtwisted contact manifolds admit infinitely many periodic Reeb orbits?
This page was built for publication: Trapped Reeb orbits do not imply periodic ones
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q464829)