A Note on the Adaptive Control of False Discovery Rates

DOI10.1111/j.1369-7412.2003.05527.xzbMath1062.62130MaRDI QIDQ4665847

Mik Black

Publication date: 11 April 2005

Published in: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7412.2003.05527.x

zbMATH Keywords

simulations; multiple comparisons

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

62J15: Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing

Related Items

Controlling the Familywise Error Rate with Plug-in Estimator for the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses, Estimating the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses, with application to DNA Microarray Data, Dependence aliasing and the control of family-wise error rate in multiple hypothesis testing, Evaluations of FDR-controlling procedures in multiple hypothesis testing, A clarifying comparison of methods for controlling the false discovery rate, Estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses in high-dimensional data under dependence, Two simple sufficient conditions for FDR control, Asymptotically optimal sequential FDR and pFDR control with (or without) prior information on the number of signals, Mixed model prediction and small area estimation. (With comments of P. Hall, D. Morales, C. N. Morris, J. N. K. Rao, and J. L. Eltinge)

Cites Work

• On the False Discovery Rate and Expected Type I Errors
• A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
• Operating Characteristics and Extensions of the False Discovery Rate Procedure
• Statistical significance for genomewide studies