Evaluating Agreement with a Gold Standard in Method Comparison Studies

DOI10.2307/3109761zbMath1058.62620OpenAlexW2326509302WikidataQ52241433 ScholiaQ52241433MaRDI QIDQ4665989

Roy T. St. Laurent

Publication date: 11 April 2005

Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/3109761

zbMATH Keywords

correlationintraclass correlation coefficientagreementrandom effects modelgold standardmethod comparison study

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Related Items

Evaluating the Agreement of Two Quantitative Assays with Repeated Measurements ⋮ Confidence intervals on intraclass correlation coefficients in a balanced two-factor random design ⋮ Generalizing R² for deming regressions ⋮ Modeling the agreement of discrete bivariate survival times using kappa coefficient ⋮ Fixed-effects modeling of Cohen's weighted kappa for bivariate multinomial data ⋮ Selecting the instrument closest to a gold standard ⋮ Nonparametric Estimation of the Concordance Correlation Coefficient under Univariate Censoring ⋮ TESTING THE AGREEMENT OF TWO QUANTITATIVE ASSAYS IN INDIVIDUAL MEANS ⋮ Fixed-effects modeling of Cohen's weighted kappa for bivariate multinomial data: a perspective of generalized inverse