A Comparison of Two Methods for Adaptive Interim Analyses in Clinical Trials
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4666004
DOI10.2307/3109775zbMath1058.62668OpenAlexW2318239986WikidataQ48795595 ScholiaQ48795595MaRDI QIDQ4666004
Publication date: 11 April 2005
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/3109775
Related Items
Estimation of a Parameter and Its Exact Confidence Interval Following Sequential Sample Size Reestimation Trials, Basic concepts of multiple tests -- a survey, Adaptive Design and Estimation in Randomized Clinical Trials with Correlated Observations, Robustness of sample size re-estimation with interim binary data for double-blind clinical trials, Adaptive Sample Size Calculations in Group Sequential Trials, Interim Analysis and Sample Size Reassessment, On Sample Size and Inference for Two‐Stage Adaptive Designs, Adaptive Group Sequential Designs for Clinical Trials: Combining the Advantages of Adaptive and of Classical Group Sequential Approaches, Procedures for testing multiple endpoints in clinical trials: an overview, Basic concepts of group sequential and adaptive group sequential test procedures, Adaptive Design for Censored Survival Data Adjusting for Covariates, THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE CONCEPT OF A PROSPECTIVELY DESIGNED TWO-STAGE CLINICAL TRIAL
