Comparing the Performances of Diggle's Tests of Spatial Randomness for Small Samples with and without Edge‐Effect Correction: Application to Ecological Data

DOI10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00156.xzbMath1059.62651OpenAlexW1986985123WikidataQ30650086 ScholiaQ30650086MaRDI QIDQ4666536

Camille Duby, Jacques Gignoux, Sébastien Barot

Publication date: 13 April 2005

Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00156.x

zbMATH Keywords

Monte Carlopowerpoint processbiasspatial patternnearest neighbordistance method

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Related Items (3)

Weak dependence of point processes and application to second-order statistics^† ⋮ A Studentized Permutation Test for the Comparison of Spatial Point Patterns ⋮ Testing the complete spatial randomness by Diggle's test without an arbitrary upper limit

Uses Software

• spatial

Cites Work

• Kaplan-Meier estimators of distance distributions for spatial point processes
• Statistical Inference for Spatial Processes
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Comparing the Performances of Diggle's Tests of Spatial Randomness for Small Samples with and without Edge‐Effect Correction: Application to Ecological Data