On the measure of conflicts: an argumentation-based framework

DOI10.1080/11663081.2018.1457255zbMATH Open1436.68339OpenAlexW2800500574MaRDI QIDQ4685531

Badran Raddaoui

Publication date: 9 October 2018

Published in: Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2018.1457255

zbMATH Keywords

inconsistency measurespropositional logicdeductive argumentation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Knowledge representation (68T30) Theory of languages and software systems (knowledge-based systems, expert systems, etc.) for artificial intelligence (68T35) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Measuring inconsistency
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Analysing inconsistent first-order knowledgebases
• Algorithms for computing minimal unsatisfiable subsets of constraints
• Revisiting Postulates for Inconsistency Measures
• Computing inconsistency measure based on paraconsistent semantics
• Inconsistency measures for probabilistic logics
• Computational approaches to finding and measuring inconsistency in arbitrary knowledge bases
• Distance-Based Measures of Inconsistency
• Measuring Inconsistency through Minimal Proofs
• Inconsistency Tolerance
• On the measure of conflicts: Shapley inconsistency values
• A syntax-based approach to measuring the degree of inconsistency for belief bases
• Stream-based inconsistency measurement
• Measures of inconsistency and defaults
• A theory of diagnosis from first principles
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
• Measuring and repairing inconsistency in probabilistic knowledge bases
• Classifications for inconsistent theories
• Measuring the blame of each formula for inconsistent prioritized knowledge bases
• MEASURING INCONSISTENCY IN A NETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION RULE SET BASED ON SNORT
• Responsibility for inconsistency
• Quantifying conflicts in propositional logic through prime implicates
• Measuring coherence using LP-models
• How Dirty Is Your Relational Database? An Axiomatic Approach
• Using Shapley Inconsistency Values for Distributed Information Systems with Uncertainty

Cited In (1)

• A multicriteria approach for analysis of conflicts in evidence theory

Recommendations

• A multicriteria approach for analysis of conflicts in evidence theory 👍 👎
• Conflict-Tolerant Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks 👍 👎
• QUANTIFICATION OF CONFLICT IN DEMPSTER-SHAFER FRAMEWORK: A NEW APPROACH 👍 👎
• An inference procedure for conflict models 👍 👎
• A Relaxation of Internal Conflict and Defence in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks 👍 👎
• Measuring Disagreement in Argumentation Graphs 👍 👎
• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: On the measure of conflicts: an argumentation-based framework

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4685531)