Subcomplete forcing, trees, and generic absoluteness
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:4692091)
Abstract: We investigate properties of trees of height and their preservation under subcomplete forcing. We show that subcomplete forcing cannot add a new branch to an -tree. We introduce fragments of subcompleteness which are preserved by subcomplete forcing, and use these in order to show that certain strong forms of rigidity of Suslin trees are preserved by subcomplete forcings. Finally, we explore under what circumstances subcomplete forcing preserves Aronszajn trees of height and width . We show that this is the case if CH fails, and if CH holds, then this is the case iff the bounded subcomplete forcing axiom holds. Finally, we explore the relationships between bounded forcing axioms, preservation of Aronszajn trees of height and width and generic absoluteness of -statements over first order structures of size , also for other canonical classes of forcing.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Bounded forcing axioms as principles of generic absoluteness
- Closed maximality principles: implications, separations and combinations
- Closure properties of parametric subcompleteness
- Degrees of rigidity for Souslin trees
- Hierarchies of (virtual) resurrection axioms
- Hierarchies of forcing axioms, the continuum hypothesis and square principles
- On Closed Sets of Ordinals
- Specializing Aronszajn Trees and Preserving Some Weak Diamonds
- Subcomplete forcing and \(\mathcal{L}\)-forcing
- The bounded proper forcing axiom
- Weak square and stationary reflection
Cited in
(13)- Diagonal reflections on squares
- Closure properties of parametric subcompleteness
- The subcompleteness of diagonal Prikry
- Forcing axioms via ground model interpretations
- The tree property at _2 and bounded forcing axioms
- Hierarchies of (virtual) resurrection axioms
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 205700 (Why is no real title available?)
- ARONSZAJN TREE PRESERVATION AND BOUNDED FORCING AXIOMS
- Combining resurrection and maximality
- Subcomplete forcing principles and definable well-orders
- Special subsets of the reals and tree forcing notions
- The special tree number
- Iteration theorems for subversions of forcing classes
This page was built for publication: Subcomplete forcing, trees, and generic absoluteness
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4692091)