A counterexample to sparse removal

From MaRDI portal
Publication:472399

DOI10.1016/J.EJC.2014.09.008zbMATH Open1302.05089arXiv1312.2994OpenAlexW2089062285WikidataQ124840434 ScholiaQ124840434MaRDI QIDQ472399FDOQ472399


Authors: Craig Timmons, J. Verstraëte Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 19 November 2014

Published in: European Journal of Combinatorics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The Tur'{a}n number of a graph H, denoted mboxex(n,H), is the maximum number of edges in an n-vertex graph with no subgraph isomorphic to H. Solymosi conjectured that if H is any graph and mboxex(n,H)=O(nalpha) where alpha>1, then any n-vertex graph with the property that each edge lies in exactly one copy of H has o(nalpha) edges. This can be viewed as conjecturing a possible extension of the removal lemma to sparse graphs, and is well-known to be true when H is a non-bipartite graph, in particular when H is a triangle, due to Ruzsa and Szemer'{e}di. Using Sidon sets we exhibit infinitely many bipartite graphs H for which the conjecture is false.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.2994




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (9)





This page was built for publication: A counterexample to sparse removal

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q472399)