Efficient designs for comparing test treatments with a control
DOI10.1093/BIOMET/76.4.783zbMATH Open0681.62061OpenAlexW2109459507MaRDI QIDQ4730633FDOQ4730633
Authors: Sudhir Gupta
Publication date: 1989
Published in: Biometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/76.4.783
Recommendations
- A-Efficient block designs for comparing two disjoint sets of treatments
- \(A\)- and \(MV\)-efficient block designs for comparing a set of controls to a set of test treatments
- A-optimal block designs for comparing test treatments with a control
- On bounds for the efficiency of block designs for comparing test treatments with a control
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2063710
efficiencymultiple comparisonsbalancetreatment effectscontrastsS-type designsnonorthogonal designsupplementedtrace optimalitycontrol versus testlower bound to the average variance of supplemented contrastsmost efficient
Optimal statistical designs (62K05) Statistical block designs (62K10) Factorial statistical designs (62K15)
Cited In (5)
- A bound for efficiency in multiple response designs
- Efficient designs for one-sided comparisons of two or three treatments with a control in a one-way layout
- Comparisons with a control in two‐way and one‐way designs, and determining whether the most effective treatment has been selected with probability 1‐α
- Comparing dual with single treatments in block designs
- Title not available (Why is that?)
This page was built for publication: Efficient designs for comparing test treatments with a control
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4730633)