Inaccuracy of the X 2 Test of Goodness of Fit when Expected Frequenies are Small
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4773147
DOI10.2307/2284509zbMATH Open0286.62017OpenAlexW4232509203MaRDI QIDQ4773147FDOQ4773147
Publication date: 1973
Published in: Journal of the American Statistical Association (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2284509
Exact distribution theory in statistics (62E15) Nonparametric hypothesis testing (62G10) Monte Carlo methods (65C05)
Cited In (8)
- Improving the accuracy of goodness-of-fit tests based on Rao's divergence with small sample size.
- Small-sample comparisons for powerdivergence goodness-of-fit statistics for symmetric and skewed simple null hypotheses
- Analysis of residuals for the multinomial item response model
- The sizes of the three popular asymptotic tests for testing homogeneity of two binomial proportions
- Power-law distributions in binned empirical data
- A Simple Algorithm for Exact Multinomial Tests
- The Poisson and chi-squared approximations as compared with the true upper-tail probability of Pearson's \(X^ 2\) for equiprobable multinomials
- A survey of algorithms for exact distributions of test statistics in r\(\times c\) contingency tables with fixed margins
This page was built for publication: Inaccuracy of the X 2 Test of Goodness of Fit when Expected Frequenies are Small
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4773147)