Inaccuracy of the X 2 Test of Goodness of Fit when Expected Frequenies are Small

DOI10.2307/2284509MaRDI QIDQ4773147zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Merle W. Tate, Leon A. Hyer

Publication date 1973

Published in Journal of the American Statistical Association (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.2307/2284509

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Exact distribution theory in statistics (62E15) Nonparametric hypothesis testing (62G10) Monte Carlo methods (65C05)

Cited in

(8)

• A survey of algorithms for exact distributions of test statistics in r\(\times c\) contingency tables with fixed margins
• Improving the accuracy of goodness-of-fit tests based on Rao's divergence with small sample size.
• Small-sample comparisons for powerdivergence goodness-of-fit statistics for symmetric and skewed simple null hypotheses
• Analysis of residuals for the multinomial item response model
• The sizes of the three popular asymptotic tests for testing homogeneity of two binomial proportions
• Power-law distributions in binned empirical data
• A Simple Algorithm for Exact Multinomial Tests
• The Poisson and chi-squared approximations as compared with the true upper-tail probability of Pearson's \(X^ 2\) for equiprobable multinomials

This page was built for publication: Inaccuracy of the X 2 Test of Goodness of Fit when Expected Frequenies are Small

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4773147)