Deterministic vs non-deterministic graph property testing

From MaRDI portal
Publication:480810

DOI10.1007/S11856-014-1096-XzbMATH Open1304.05123arXiv1304.1982OpenAlexW2155726088MaRDI QIDQ480810FDOQ480810

Asaf Shapira, Lior Gishboliner

Publication date: 11 December 2014

Published in: Israel Journal of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A graph property P is said to be testable if one can check if a graph is close or far from satisfying P using few random local inspections. Property P is said to be non-deterministically testable if one can supply a "certificate" to the fact that a graph satisfies P so that once the certificate is given its correctness can be tested. The notion of non-deterministic testing of graph properties was recently introduced by Lovasz and Vesztergombi, who proved that (somewhat surprisingly) a graph property is testable if and only if it is non-deterministically testable. Their proof used graph limits, and so it did not supply any explicit bounds. They thus asked if one can obtain a proof of their result which will supply such bounds. We answer their question positively by proving their result using Szemeredi's regularity lemma. An interesting aspect of our proof is that it highlights the fact that the regularity lemma can be interpreted as saying that all graphs can be approximated by finitely many "template" graphs.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.1982




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (2)





This page was built for publication: Deterministic vs non-deterministic graph property testing

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q480810)