RE-IDENTIFYING REGISTER DATA BY SURVEY DATA USING CLUSTER ANALYSIS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY

DOI10.1142/S0218488502001661zbMATH Open1135.62303MaRDI QIDQ4824636FDOQ4824636

Authors: Johann Bacher, Ruth Brand, Stefan Bender 

Publication date: 1 November 2004

Published in: International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Recommendations

• Proposals for 2001 Samples of Anonymized Records: An Assessment of Disclosure Risk
• Estimating Risks of Identification Disclosure in Microdata
• Disclosure risk and replication-based variance estimation
• A Measure of Disclosure Risk for Microdata
• Microdata disclosure by resampling -- empirical findings for business survey data

zbMATH Keywords

measurement errorCluster analysisre-identificationirrelevant variablesregister data

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30) Software, source code, etc. for problems pertaining to statistics (62-04) Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05) Applications of statistics to social sciences (62P25)

Cites Work

• Weighting and selection of variables for cluster analysis

Cited In (7)

• First results on factual anonymiziation of business-statistical microdata
• Proposals for 2001 Samples of Anonymized Records: An Assessment of Disclosure Risk
• Disclosure control of business microdata: a density-based approach
• The German administrative record census -- an object identification problem
• A probabilistic perspective on re-identifiability
• On the connections between statistical disclosure control for microdata and some artificial intelligence tools
• Selecting potentially relevant records using re-identification methods

This page was built for publication: RE-IDENTIFYING REGISTER DATA BY SURVEY DATA USING CLUSTER ANALYSIS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4824636)