Are our parameter estimators biased? The significance of finite-difference regularization operators

DOI10.1088/0266-5611/11/2/009MaRDI QIDQ4833852zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors J. Ory, R. G. Pratt

Publication date 16 November 1995

Published in Inverse Problems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/11/2/009

zbMATH Keywords

biased estimatorsfinite-difference operatorsill- conditioningleast squares inversionsmodel covariance operatorsnonlinear inverse problemregularizationseismic waveformssingular value decomposition

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Point estimation (62F10) Probabilistic methods, stochastic differential equations (65C99) Numerical solutions to overdetermined systems, pseudoinverses (65F20) Seismology (including tsunami modeling), earthquakes (86A15) Inverse problems in geophysics (86A22)

Recommendations

• Regularisation of nonlinear inverse problems: imaging the near-surface weathering layer
• Robust methods in inverse theory
• Analysis of approximate inverses in tomography. I: Resolution analysis of common inverses
• Bias-corrected regularized solution to inverse ill-posed models

Cited in

(4)

• Model estimations biased by truncated expansions: possible artifacts in seismic tomography
• Regularisation of nonlinear inverse problems: imaging the near-surface weathering layer
• Bias-corrected regularized solution to inverse ill-posed models
• Conditioning of multiple-point statistics facies simulations to tomographic images

This page was built for publication: Are our parameter estimators biased? The significance of finite-difference regularization operators

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4833852)