Comparison of symbolic and numerical integration methods for an assumed‐stress hybrid shell element
DOI10.1002/CNM.1640110404zbMATH Open0820.73071OpenAlexW1971455627MaRDI QIDQ4834320FDOQ4834320
Authors: G. Rengarajan, Norman F. jun. Knight, Mohammad A. Aminpour 
Publication date: 28 May 1995
Published in: Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19950006683
Recommendations
- The application of symbolic computing to the hierarchical finite element method
- Explicit integration of the stiffness matrix of a four-noded-plane-elasticity finite element
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 774961
- Semi‐analytical integration of the 8‐node plane element stiffness matrix using symbolic computation
- Symbolic integration of multibody system dynamics with the finite element method
Symbolic computation and algebraic computation (68W30) Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05) Membranes (74K15)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Computerized symbolic manipulation in nonlinear finite element analysis
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- An assumed-stress hybrid 4-node shell element with drilling degrees of freedom
- Computerized symbolic manipulation in structural mechanics—Progress and potential
- Symbolic generation of finite element stiffness matrices
- An efficient quadrilateral element for plate bending analysis
- Improved assumed‐stress hybrid shell element with drilling degrees of freedom for linear stress, buckling and free vibration analyses
- Covering of 2-dimensional manifolds with open cells
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (3)
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Comparison of symbolic and numerical integration methods for an assumed‐stress hybrid shell element
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4834320)
