Comparison of symbolic and numerical integration methods for an assumed‐stress hybrid shell element
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4834320
Recommendations
- The application of symbolic computing to the hierarchical finite element method
- Explicit integration of the stiffness matrix of a four-noded-plane-elasticity finite element
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 774961
- Semi‐analytical integration of the 8‐node plane element stiffness matrix using symbolic computation
- Symbolic integration of multibody system dynamics with the finite element method
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3917698 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 44702 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 45391 (Why is no real title available?)
- An assumed-stress hybrid 4-node shell element with drilling degrees of freedom
- An efficient quadrilateral element for plate bending analysis
- Computerized symbolic manipulation in nonlinear finite element analysis
- Computerized symbolic manipulation in structural mechanics—Progress and potential
- Covering of 2-dimensional manifolds with open cells
- Improved assumed‐stress hybrid shell element with drilling degrees of freedom for linear stress, buckling and free vibration analyses
- Symbolic generation of finite element stiffness matrices
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Comparison of symbolic and numerical integration methods for an assumed‐stress hybrid shell element
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4834320)