Using default tests in repeated measures: how bad can it get?

DOI10.1080/03610919408813158MaRDI QIDQ4844129zbMATHOpenAlexFDO

Authors Robert Schaefer

Publication date 20 August 1995

Published in Communications in Statistics. Simulation and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/03610919408813158

zbMATH Keywords

repeated measuressimulationstatistical package

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Recommendations

• The analysis of repeated measurements: Univariate tests, multivariate tests, or both?
• Serially correlated errors in some single-subject designs
• A comparison of the power of some tests for repeated measurements
• Analysis of Type I Error Rates of Univariate and Multivariate Procedures in Repeated Measures Designs
• Comparison of approximate tests of fixed effects in linear repeated measures design models with covariates

Cites work

• Nested Analysis of Variance with Autocorrelated Errors
• On methods in the analysis of profile data
• Some Views on Parametric and Non-Parametric Analysis for Repeated Measurements and Selected Bibliography

Cited in

(1)

• Serially correlated errors in some single-subject designs

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• MINITAB
• SAS

This page was built for publication: Using default tests in repeated measures: how bad can it get?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4844129)