Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing

DOI10.1007/S13253-012-0126-6zbMATH Open1302.62260OpenAlexW1975518343MaRDI QIDQ484772FDOQ484772

Authors: Graham Hepworth 

Publication date: 7 January 2015

Published in: Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/282977

Recommendations

• Bias correction of estimated proportions using inverse binomial group testing
• Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing
• Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing
• Improved Empirical Bayes Estimation in Group Testing Procedure for Small Proportions
• Mid-\(P\) confidence intervals for group testing based on the total number of positive groups

zbMATH Keywords

bias correctiongroup testingcoveragenegative binomial distributioninverse samplingestimation of proportionsmid-P

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics (62P12)

Cites Work

• Significance Tests in Discrete Distributions
• On the informativeness and accuracy of pooled testing in estimating prevalence of a rare disease: Application to HIV screening
• ON A METHOD OF ESTIMATING FREQUENCIES
• Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples
• Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing
• Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing
• Bayesian inference for prevalence and diagnostic test accuracy based on dual-pooled screening
• Exact Confidence Intervals for Proportions Estimated by Group Testing
• Mid-P confidence intervals based on the likelihood ratio for proportions estimated by group testing

Cited In (20)

• Estimation of binomial proportions from pooled samples using an objective prior
• Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples
• Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing
• Bias correction of estimated proportions using inverse binomial group testing
• Confidence interval procedures for proportions estimated by group testing with groups of unequal size adjusted for overdispersion
• Some limit results in estimation of proportion based on group testing
• Mid-\(P\) confidence intervals for group testing based on the total number of positive groups
• Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing
• Revisiting retesting in the estimation of proportions by group testing
• Improved Empirical Bayes Estimation in Group Testing Procedure for Small Proportions
• Exact confidence intervals for proportions estimated by group testing with different group sizes
• Mid-P confidence intervals based on the likelihood ratio for proportions estimated by group testing
• An Empirical Bayes Group-Testing Approach to Estimating Small Proportions
• The optimal group size using inverse binomial group testing considering misclassification
• Proportional closeness estimation of probability of contamination under group testing
• Sequential estimation in the group testing problem
• Bias correction in estimating proportions by pooled testing
• A new estimator for a population proportion using group testing
• Estimation of log-odds ratio from group testing data using Firth correction
• Bias correction in estimating proportions by imperfect pooled testing

This page was built for publication: Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q484772)