USES AND ABUSES OF FUZZINESS IN PHILOSOPHY: A SELECTIVE SURVEY OF HOW RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC AND METAPHYSICS TREAT VAGUENESS
DOI10.1080/03081079508908043zbMATH Open0842.03007OpenAlexW2023534136MaRDI QIDQ4861649FDOQ4861649
Authors: David H. Sanford
Publication date: 13 February 1996
Published in: International Journal of General Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079508908043
Recommendations
Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) General and miscellaneous specific topics (00A99)
Cites Work
Cited In (7)
- Bipolar disorder: Horgan on vagueness and incoherence
- Are fuzzy sets a reasonable tool for modeling vague phenomena?
- On vagueness, truth values and fuzzy logics
- Comments on ``Vagueness: a mathematician's perspective by Thomas Vetterlein
- Fuzzy logic and vagueness: can philosophers learn from Petr Hájek?
- The logic for metaphysical conceptions of vagueness
- Undead argument: the truth-functionality objection to fuzzy theories of vagueness
This page was built for publication: USES AND ABUSES OF FUZZINESS IN PHILOSOPHY: A SELECTIVE SURVEY OF HOW RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC AND METAPHYSICS TREAT VAGUENESS
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4861649)