USES AND ABUSES OF FUZZINESS IN PHILOSOPHY: A SELECTIVE SURVEY OF HOW RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC AND METAPHYSICS TREAT VAGUENESS

DOI10.1080/03081079508908043MaRDI QIDQ4861649zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors David H. Sanford

Publication date 13 February 1996

Published in International Journal of General Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079508908043

zbMATH Keywords

borderline casefuzzy setssupervaluationvagueness

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and miscellaneous specific topics (00A99) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• On vagueness, truth values and fuzzy logics
• Ten questions and one problem on fuzzy logic
• Are fuzzy sets a reasonable tool for modeling vague phenomena?
• The logic for metaphysical conceptions of vagueness
• Varieties of vagueness, fuzziness and a few foundational (and ontological) questions

Cites work

• A Note on the Logic of (Higher-Order) Vagueness
• Competing semantics of vagueness: Many values versus super-truth
• Is Higher Order Vagueness Coherent?
• Vagueness, truth and logic
• Wang's paradox
• Wright and Sainsbury on Higher-Order Vagueness

Cited in

(7)

• On vagueness, truth values and fuzzy logics
• Undead argument: the truth-functionality objection to fuzzy theories of vagueness
• Bipolar disorder: Horgan on vagueness and incoherence
• Fuzzy logic and vagueness: can philosophers learn from Petr Hájek?
• Comments on ``Vagueness: a mathematician's perspective by Thomas Vetterlein
• The logic for metaphysical conceptions of vagueness
• Are fuzzy sets a reasonable tool for modeling vague phenomena?

This page was built for publication: USES AND ABUSES OF FUZZINESS IN PHILOSOPHY: A SELECTIVE SURVEY OF HOW RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC AND METAPHYSICS TREAT VAGUENESS

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4861649)