Can simple geometrical objects be maximal compact extensions for \mathbb{R}^n?

DOI10.1070/RM1994V049N06ABEH002459MaRDI QIDQ4872726zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Yu. M. Smirnov

Publication date 24 March 1996

Published in Russian Mathematical Surveys (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1070/rm1994v049n06abeh002459

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Extensions of spaces (compactifications, supercompactifications, completions, etc.) (54D35) Transformation groups and semigroups (topological aspects) (54H15)

Recommendations

• Does a compact operator admit a maximal domain for its compact linear extension?
• Is it possible to point out a simple criterion of maximality for a nonnegative lineal in a space with a regular indefinite metric?
• Remarks on the n-dimensional geometric measure of compacta
• How rigid the finite ultrametric spaces can be?
• A Geometric Inequality for Certain Types of Compact Sets in R n
• Can a Subset's Topology Detect Continuous Extensions?
• Does any noncompact manifold with a boundary possess a compactification which is a manifold?
• On embeddability of contractible \(k\)-dimensional compacta into \(\mathbb{R}^{2k}\)
• On contractible 𝑛-dimensional compacta, non-embeddable into ℝ²ⁿ
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 278869

Cited in

(5)

• Maximal equivariant compactification of the Urysohn spaces and other metric structures
• On the \(G\)-compactifications of the rational numbers
• Maximal equivariant compactifications
• Does a compact operator admit a maximal domain for its compact linear extension?
• A method for constructing semilattices of \(G\)-compactifications

This page was built for publication: Can simple geometrical objects be maximal compact extensions for $ \mathbb{R}^n$?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4872726)