Comparing contingency table tests in logistic regression using bootstrap sampling

MaRDI QIDQ4902824zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Brian P. Barthel, Mezbahur Rahman

Publication date 18 January 2013

Full work available at URL http://www.pphmj.com/abstract/7135.htm

zbMATH Keywords

deviance statisticmaximum likelihood estimatequantiles

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Bootstrap, jackknife and other resampling methods (62F40) Contingency tables (62H17)

Recommendations

• A comparison of the Hosmer-Lemeshow, Pigeon-Heyse, and Tsiatis goodness-of-fit tests for binary logistic regression under two grouping methods
• A chi-squared goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression models based on case-control data
• An Improved Goodness-of-Fit Test for Logistic Regression Models Based on Case-Control Data by Random Partition
• Bootstrap tests for independence in two-way ordinal contingency tables
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1807483

Cited in

(3)

• A comparison of the Hosmer-Lemeshow, Pigeon-Heyse, and Tsiatis goodness-of-fit tests for binary logistic regression under two grouping methods
• A NOTE ON HOSMER-LEMESHOW TEST IN LOGISTIC MODELS
• Performance comparison of independence tests in two-way contingency table

This page was built for publication: Comparing contingency table tests in logistic regression using bootstrap sampling

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4902824)