Dealing with Parasitic Behaviour in G-Symplectic Integrators

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-33221-0_7zbMath1263.65068OpenAlexW203731418MaRDI QIDQ4915532

John C. Butcher

Publication date: 10 April 2013

Published in: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33221-0_7

zbMATH Keywords

numerical examplesG-symplectic methodsconservative integrationexacerbation of parasitic effects

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Nonlinear ordinary differential equations and systems (34A34) Numerical methods for initial value problems involving ordinary differential equations (65L05) Numerical methods for Hamiltonian systems including symplectic integrators (65P10) Discretization methods and integrators (symplectic, variational, geometric, etc.) for dynamical systems (37M15)

Related Items

Composite symmetric second derivative general linear methods for Hamiltonian systems ⋮ Runge–Kutta Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations ⋮ G-symplectic second derivative general linear methods for Hamiltonian problems ⋮ The cohesiveness of G-symplectic methods ⋮ G-symplecticity implies conjugate-symplecticity of the underlying one-step method ⋮ Numerical integration of Hamiltonian problems by G-symplectic methods ⋮ An iterative starting method to control parasitism for the Leapfrog method ⋮ Nearly conservative multivalue methods with extended bounded parasitism ⋮ Multi-value Numerical Methods for Hamiltonian Systems

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• The existence of symplectic general linear methods
• Stability of Runge-Kutta Methods for Trajectory Problems
• Trapezoidal Methods of Approximating Solutions of Differential Equations
• Stability Criteria for Implicit Runge–Kutta Methods
• The Control of Parasitism in $G$-symplectic Methods
• Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations