Binary classification with pFDR‐pFNR losses

DOI10.1002/bimj.201200054zbMath1441.62325WikidataQ44000423 ScholiaQ44000423MaRDI QIDQ4921960

Benjamin Blankertz, Thorsten Dickhaus, Frank Meinecke

Publication date: 28 May 2013

Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201200054

zbMATH Keywords

weak dependence; false discovery rate; density ratio estimation; brain-computer interfaces; autocorrelated data

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

62P10: Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis

62J15: Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing

Uses Software

• ElemStatLearn

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Asymptotic Bayes-optimality under sparsity of some multiple testing procedures
• Microarrays, empirical Bayes and the two-groups model
• Robustness of multiple testing procedures against dependence
• On the false discovery rate and an asymptotically optimal rejection curve
• Time series: theory and methods.
• Robbins, empirical Bayes and microarrays
• The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the \(q\)-value
• A stochastic process approach to false discovery control.
• Nonparametric and semiparametric models.
• Two simple sufficient conditions for FDR control
• The false discovery rate for statistical pattern recognition
• Adapting to unknown sparsity by controlling the false discovery rate
• Adaptive FDR control under independence and dependence
• Higher criticism thresholding: Optimal feature selection when useful features are rare and weak
• Simultaneous and selective inference: Current successes and future challenges
• Optimal Sample Size for Multiple Testing
• Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach
• Some Results on the Control of the False Discovery Rate under Dependence
• A Bayesian Mixture Model for Differential Gene Expression