A consolidated approach to the axiomatization of outranking relations: a survey and new results
DOI10.1007/S10479-015-1803-YzbMATH Open1358.90054OpenAlexW2160896535MaRDI QIDQ492802FDOQ492802
Publication date: 21 August 2015
Published in: Annals of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1803-y
Recommendations
multiple criteria decision analysisoutranking methodsconcordance-discordance relationsconjoint measurementnontransitive preferences
Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Decision theory (91B06) Individual preferences (91B08) Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to operations research and mathematical programming (90-02)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Noncompensatory preferences
- Intransitive Indifference in Preference Theory: A Survey
- On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making (the noncompensatory approach)
- Inferrring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples
- Note—A Preference Ranking Organisation Method
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Evaluation and decision models with multiple criteria. Stepping stones for the analyst.
- Some remarks on the notion of compensation in MCDM
- Towards a theory of MCDM: Stepping away from social choice theory
- Nontransitive decomposable conjoint measurement.
- Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives: traces, dominance, and numerical representations
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference
- Following the traces: an introduction to conjoint measurement without transitivity and additivity
- An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM. I: The case of two categories
- An axiomatic analysis of concordance-discordance relations
- Noncompensatory and generalized noncompensatory preference structures
- A characterization of concordance relations
- A Common Framework for Describing Some Outranking Methods
- A characterization of generalized concordance rules in multicriteria decision making
- Outranking Relations: Do They Have Special Properties?
- An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM. II: M ore than two categories
- An axiomatic characterization of different majority concepts
- Further results on concordance relations
- Dealing with inconsistent judgments in multiple criteria sorting models
- Learning the Parameters of a Multiple Criteria Sorting Method
- Learning criteria weights of an optimistic Electre Tri sorting rule
- Statistical issues in measurement
- Biorder families, valued relations, and preference modelling
- `Additive difference' models without additivity and subtractivity
- Transitivity revisited
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (7)
- A characterization of concordance relations
- Literature reviews in operations research: a new taxonomy and a meta review
- Learning monotone preferences using a majority rule sorting model
- Further results on concordance relations
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A theoretical look at \textsc{Electre Tri}-nB and related sorting models
- A theoretical look at ordinal classification methods based on comparing actions with limiting boundaries between adjacent classes
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: A consolidated approach to the axiomatization of outranking relations: a survey and new results
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q492802)
