The role of heuristic appraisal in conflicting assessments of string theory
DOI10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.07.003zbMath1320.81079OpenAlexW1928759837MaRDI QIDQ493029
Kristian Camilleri, Sophie Ritson
Publication date: 11 September 2015
Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.07.003
Unified quantum theories (81V22) String and superstring theories in gravitational theory (83E30) Gravitational interaction in quantum theory (81V17) Quantization of the gravitational field (83C45) String and superstring theories; other extended objects (e.g., branes) in quantum field theory (81T30) Physics (00A79)
Related Items (4)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- The unification of quantum gravity
- String theory and general methodology: a mutual evaluation
- The large-\(N\) limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity
- String and M-theory: Answering the critics
- Mirror symmetry and other miracles in superstring theory
- Forty years of string theory reflecting on the foundations
- CAN THERE BE PHYSICS WITHOUT EXPERIMENTS? CHALLENGES AND PITFALLS
- de Sitter vacua in string theory
- The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
- FRONTIERS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL: REFLECTIONS AND IMPRESSIONISTIC PORTRAIT OF THE CONFERENCE
This page was built for publication: The role of heuristic appraisal in conflicting assessments of string theory