Tests of the martingale difference hypothesis using boosting and RBF neural network approximations
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4933583
Recommendations
- Testing the Martingale Difference Hypothesis
- Testing the martingale difference hypothesis using integrated regression functions
- Data-driven smooth tests for the martingale difference hypothesis
- A New Test of the Martingale Difference Hypothesis
- Generalized spectral tests for the martingale difference hypothesis
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 847242 (Why is no real title available?)
- A CONSISTENT DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR REGRESSION MODELS USING PROJECTIONS
- A Consistent Conditional Moment Test of Functional Form
- A DATA-DRIVEN NONPARAMETRIC SPECIFICATION TEST FOR DYNAMIC REGRESSION MODELS
- A radial basis function artificial neural network test for ARCH
- A radial basis function artificial neural network test for neglected nonlinearity
- Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. (With discussion and a rejoinder by the authors)
- Asymptotic Theory of Integrated Conditional Moment Tests
- Boosting for high-dimensional linear models
- CONSISTENT SPECIFICATION TESTING WITH NUISANCE PARAMETERS PRESENT ONLY UNDER THE ALTERNATIVE
- Consistent bootstrap tests of parametric regression functions
- Generalized spectral tests for the martingale difference hypothesis
- Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.
- Hypothesis Testing in Time Series via the Empirical Characteristic Function: A Generalized Spectral Density Approach
- Model specification testing of time series regressions
- Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
- Nonparametric model checks for regression
- Nonparametric model checks for time series
- Pure Significance Tests of the Unit Root Hypothesis Against Nonlinear Alternatives
- Spectral tests of the martingale hypothesis under conditional heteroscedasticity
- Stochastic Limit Theory
- Testing for ARCH in the presence of nonlinearity of unknown form in the conditional mean
- Testing for neglected nonlinearity in time series models. A comparison of neural network methods and alternative tests
- Testing the Martingale Difference Hypothesis
- Testing the martingale difference hypothesis using integrated regression functions
- The Bierens test under data dependence
- Weak greedy algorithms
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Tests of the martingale difference hypothesis using boosting and RBF neural network approximations
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4933583)