A cautionary note about assessing the fit of logistic regression models

DOI10.1080/02664769922089zbMath1072.62615OpenAlexW2017813479MaRDI QIDQ4935476

Joseph F. Heyse, Joseph G. Pigeon

Publication date: 1999

Published in: Journal of Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769922089

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Generalized linear models (logistic models) (62J12)

Related Items (5)

Summary goodness-of-fit statistics for binary generalized linear models with noncanonical link functions ⋮ Goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models when data are collected using a complex sampling design ⋮ Increasing the power: a practical approach to goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression models with continuous predictors ⋮ A comparison of the Hosmer–Lemeshow, Pigeon–Heyse, and Tsiatis goodness-of-fit tests for binary logistic regression under two grouping methods ⋮ An omnibus lack of fit test in logistic regression with sparse data

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model
• An Improved Goodness of Fit Statistic for Probability Prediction Models
• Transformations Related to the Angular and the Square Root

This page was built for publication: A cautionary note about assessing the fit of logistic regression models