Interval estimation of the 90% effective dose: A comparison of bootstrap resampling methods with some large-sample approaches
DOI10.1080/02664760021835zbMATH Open0970.62076OpenAlexW2056429091MaRDI QIDQ4935540FDOQ4935540
Authors: Yangxin Huang, Simon P. J. Kirby, Peter Harris, John C. Dearden 
Publication date: 10 April 2000
Published in: Journal of Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760021835
Recommendations
- VARIOUS METHODS OF INTERVAL ESTIMATION OF THE MEDIAN EFFECTIVE DOSE
- Robustness of interval estimation of the 90% effective dose: Bootstrap resampling and some large-sample parametric methods
- On large-sample parametric approaches for interval estimation of the \(ED_{90}\)
- Interval estimation of the \(ED_{50}\) when a logistic dose-response curve is incorrectly assumed
- Improved approaches to interval estimation of effective doses for a logistic dose-response curve
Bootstrap, jackknife and other resampling methods (62F40) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)
Cited In (5)
- VARIOUS METHODS OF INTERVAL ESTIMATION OF THE MEDIAN EFFECTIVE DOSE
- On large-sample parametric approaches for interval estimation of the \(ED_{90}\)
- Multivariate piecewise joint models with random change-points for skewed-longitudinal and survival data
- A short prehistory of the bootstrap
- Robustness of interval estimation of the 90% effective dose: Bootstrap resampling and some large-sample parametric methods
This page was built for publication: Interval estimation of the 90% effective dose: A comparison of bootstrap resampling methods with some large-sample approaches
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4935540)
