Simple proofs of SCH from reflection principles without using better scales

DOI10.1007/S00153-015-0432-0MaRDI QIDQ494653zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Hiroshi Sakai

Publication date 1 September 2015

Published in Archive for Mathematical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-015-0432-0

zbMATH Keywords

singular cardinal hypothesisFodor-type reflection principleweak reflection principle

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Large cardinals (03E55) Other set-theoretic hypotheses and axioms (03E65)

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 734993 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1113072 (Why is no real title available?)
• Fodor-type reflection principle and reflection of metrizability and meta-Lindelöfness
• Forcing axioms and stationary sets
• Martin's maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters. I
• Nonreflecting stationary sets in \(\mathcal P_{\kappa}\lambda\)
• On reflection of stationary sets
• On the consistency strength of the proper forcing axiom
• Openly generated Boolean algebras and the Fodor-type reflection principle
• Reflection implies the SCH
• Stationary reflection principles and two cardinal tree properties
• The combinatorial essence of supercompactness
• The proper forcing axiom and the singular cardinal hypothesis
• \(\Pi_2\) consequences of \(\mathsf{BMM}+\mathsf{NS}_{\omega_1}\) is precipitous and the semiproperness of stationary set preserving forcings

Cited in

(2)

• Sigma-Prikry forcing. III: Down to \(\aleph_{\omega}\)
• The two-cardinals transfer property and resurrection of supercompactness 󠀼span style=󠀢color:red󠀢󠀾This article has been retracted󠀼/span󠀾

This page was built for publication: Simple proofs of SCH from reflection principles without using better scales

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q494653)