Theoretical comparison of the FETI and algebraically partitioned FETI methods, and performance comparisons with a direct sparse solver

DOI<501::AID-NME685>3.0.CO;2-7 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19991010)46:4<501::AID-NME685>3.0.CO;2-7zbMath0977.74065OpenAlexW2068663505MaRDI QIDQ4951623

Daniel J. Rixen, Charbel Farhat, Radek Tezaur, Jan Mandel

Publication date: 17 January 2002

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0207(19991010)46:4<501::aid-nme685>3.0.co;2-7

zbMATH Keywords

domain decomposition scalability stress analysis three-dimensional structure iterative solver thin shell structure one-level FETI method Origin 2000 algebraic A-FETI method optimized sparse solver

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Multigrid methods; domain decomposition for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N55) Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05) Thin bodies, structures (74K99)

Related Items (31)

Extended preconditioners for the FETI method applied to constrained problems ⋮ A simple explicit-implicit finite element tearing and interconnecting transient analysis algorithm ⋮ A novel augmented Lagrangian-based formulation for upper-bound limit analysis ⋮ Comparison of different FETI preconditioners for elastoplasticity ⋮ Accelerating the convergence of AFETI partitioned analysis of heterogeneous structural dynamical systems ⋮ FETI and Neumann-Neumann iterative substructuring methods: Connections and new results ⋮ A dual domain decomposition algorithm for the analysis of non-conforming isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shells ⋮ The nsBETI method: an extension of the FETI method to non-symmetrical BEM-FEM coupled problems ⋮ Partitioned analysis of flexible multibody systems using filtered linear finite element deformational modes ⋮ Simultaneous FETI and block FETI: Robust domain decomposition with multiple search directions ⋮ The impact of enabling multiple subdomains per MPI process in the TFETI domain decomposition method ⋮ On the initial estimate of interface forces in FETI methods. ⋮ The mosaic of high performance domain decomposition methods for structural mechanics: formulation, interrelation and numerical efficiency of primal and dual methods. ⋮ Partitioned treatment of uncertainty in coupled domain problems: a separated representation approach ⋮ FETI-DP: a dual-primal unified FETI method?part I: A faster alternative to the two-level FETI method ⋮ A continuous framework for FETI-DP with a mesh independent condition number for the dual problem ⋮ A numerically scalable domain decomposition method for the solution of frictionless contact problems ⋮ BDDC and FETI-DP under minimalist assumptions ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ An algebraic theory for primal and dual substructuring methods by constraints ⋮ Iterative solvers for coupled fluid-solid scattering ⋮ On dual Schur domain decomposition method for linear first-order transient problems ⋮ A FETI-based domain decomposition technique for time-dependent first-order systems based on a DAE approach ⋮ A FETI method with a mesh independent condition number for the iteration matrix ⋮ Non-overlapping domain decomposition methods in structural mechanics ⋮ Multi-scale domain decomposition method for large-scale structural analysis with a zooming technique: Application to plate assembly ⋮ A FETI‐preconditioned conjugate gradient method for large‐scale stochastic finite element problems ⋮ Adaptive selection of face coarse degrees of freedom in the BDDC and the FETI-DP iterative substructuring methods ⋮ The second generation FETI methods and their application to the parallel solution of large-scale linear and geometrically non-linear structural analysis problems ⋮ The mosaic of high-performance domain decomposition methods for structural mechanics. II: Formulation enhancements, multiple right-hand sides and implicit dynamics ⋮ An iterative substructuring method for coupled fluid-solid acoustic problems

Cites Work

Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Theoretical comparison of the FETI and algebraically partitioned FETI methods, and performance comparisons with a direct sparse solver