Bypassing UGC from some optimal geometric inapproximability results
DOI10.1145/2737729zbMATH Open1398.68194OpenAlexW2397159611MaRDI QIDQ4962201FDOQ4962201
Authors: Prasad Raghavendra, Rishi Saket, Yi Wu, Venkatesan Guruswami
Publication date: 30 October 2018
Published in: ACM Transactions on Algorithms (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2737729
Recommendations
Computational difficulty of problems (lower bounds, completeness, difficulty of approximation, etc.) (68Q17) Computer graphics; computational geometry (digital and algorithmic aspects) (68U05) Approximation algorithms (68W25)
Cited In (11)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A greedy algorithm for subspace approximation problem
- The UGC hardness threshold of the \(L_{p}\) Grothendieck problem
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Grothendieck-type inequalities in combinatorial optimization
- The UGC hardness threshold of the \(l_p\) Grothendieck problem
- The \(\ell^p\)-Gaussian-Grothendieck problem with vector spins
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Algorithms and hardness for subspace approximation
- The quest for strong inapproximability results with perfect completeness
- Inapproximability of Matrix \(\boldsymbol{p \rightarrow q}\) Norms
This page was built for publication: Bypassing UGC from some optimal geometric inapproximability results
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4962201)