In defense of Benacerraf's multiple-reductions argument

DOI10.1093/PHILMAT/NKZ009zbMATH Open1423.03027OpenAlexW2953227531MaRDI QIDQ4968484FDOQ4968484

Authors: Michele Ginammi 

Publication date: 12 July 2019

Published in: Philosophia Mathematica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/0cf24b0f010778d67a49d4642a3a4c0793d9e340

Recommendations

• Multiple Reductions Revisited
• On Number-Set Identity: A Study
• Reducing arithmetic to set theory
• On the essence and identity of numbers
• Antireductionism and ordinals

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Ordinal and cardinal numbers (03E10)

Cited In (6)

• Arithmetic, set theory, reduction and explanation
• Kripke, Quine and Steiner on Representing Natural Numbers in Set Theory
• On the essence and identity of numbers
• Reducing arithmetic to set theory
• Antireductionism and ordinals
• Multiple Reductions Revisited

This page was built for publication: In defense of Benacerraf's multiple-reductions argument

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4968484)