In defense of Benacerraf's multiple-reductions argument

DOI10.1093/PHILMAT/NKZ009MaRDI QIDQ4968484zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Michele Ginammi

Publication date 12 July 2019

Published in Philosophia Mathematica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://semanticscholar.org/paper/0cf24b0f010778d67a49d4642a3a4c0793d9e340

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Ordinal and cardinal numbers (03E10)

Recommendations

• Multiple Reductions Revisited
• On Number-Set Identity: A Study
• Reducing arithmetic to set theory
• On the essence and identity of numbers
• Antireductionism and ordinals

Cited in

(6)

• Arithmetic, set theory, reduction and explanation
• Kripke, Quine and Steiner on Representing Natural Numbers in Set Theory
• On the essence and identity of numbers
• Reducing arithmetic to set theory
• Antireductionism and ordinals
• Multiple Reductions Revisited

This page was built for publication: In defense of Benacerraf's multiple-reductions argument

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4968484)