Evaluating, comparing, monitoring, and improving representativeness of survey response through R-indicators and partial R-indicators

DOI10.1111/J.1751-5823.2012.00189.XMaRDI QIDQ4968541zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Barry Schouten, Jelke Bethlehem, Koen Beullens, Øyvin Kleven, Geert Loosveldt, Annemieke Luiten, Katja Rutar, Natalie Shlomo, Chris Skinner

Publication date 16 July 2019

Published in International Statistical Review (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x

zbMATH Keywords

adaptive survey designnon-responsenon-response reductionparadatarepresentativity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05)

Recommendations

• Estimation of an indicator of the representativeness of survey response
• Indicators for monitoring the survey data quality when non-response or a convenience sample occurs
• Estimation in Surveys with Nonresponse
• Nonsampling errors in surveys - a review
• Adaptive survey design

Cited in

(9)

• Building panels from archives: the longitudinal representativity
• Indicators for monitoring the survey data quality when non-response or a convenience sample occurs
• Optimal resource allocation in survey designs
• Adaptive survey design
• Selecting Adaptive Survey Design Strata with Partial R‐indicators
• Estimation of an indicator of the representativeness of survey response
• Panel design effects on response rates and response quality
• Using R-indicators to address response bias: evidence from the longitudinal surveys of Australian youth
• Do coefficients of variation of response propensities approximate non-response biases during survey data collection?

This page was built for publication: Evaluating, comparing, monitoring, and improving representativeness of survey response through \(R\)-indicators and partial \(R\)-indicators

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4968541)