Comparing A^1-h-cobordism and A^1-weak equivalence
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4977754
Abstract: We study the problem of classifying projectivizations of rank-two vector bundles over up to various notions of equivalence that arise naturally in -homotopy theory, namely -weak equivalence and --cobordism. First, we classify such varieties up to -weak equivalence: over algebraically closed fields having characteristic unequal to two the classification can be given in terms of characteristic classes of the underlying vector bundle. When the base field is , this classification result can be compared to a corresponding topological result and we find that the algebraic and topological homotopy classifications agree. Second, we study the problem of classifying such varieties up to --cobordism using techniques of deformation theory. To this end, we establish a deformation rigidity result for -bundles over which links --cobordisms to deformations of the underlying vector bundles. Using results from the deformation theory of vector bundles we show that if is a -bundle over and is the projectivization of a direct sum of line bundles on , then if is -weakly equivalent to , is also --cobordant to . Finally, we discuss some subtleties inherent in the definition of --cobordism. We show, for instance, that direct --cobordism fails to be an equivalence relation.
Recommendations
- Smooth varieties up to \(\mathbb A^1\)-homotopy and algebraic \(h\)-cobordisms
- \( \mathbb{A}^1\)-homotopy equivalences and a theorem of Whitehead
- Splitting vector bundles and \(\mathbb A^{1}\)-fundamental groups of higher-dimensional varieties
- \(\mathbb{A}^1\)-algebraic topology
- Affine representability results in \(\mathbb{A}^1\)-homotopy theory. I: Vector bundles.
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: Comparing \(\mathbb{A}^1\)-\(h\)-cobordism and \(\mathbb{A}^1\)-weak equivalence
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4977754)