Sampling random spanning trees faster than matrix multiplication

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4978019

DOI10.1145/3055399.3055499zbMATH Open1370.68122arXiv1611.07451OpenAlexW2552685338MaRDI QIDQ4978019FDOQ4978019


Authors: David Durfee, Rasmus Kyng, John Peebles, Sushant Sachdeva, Anup B. Rao Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 17 August 2017

Published in: Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We present an algorithm that, with high probability, generates a random spanning tree from an edge-weighted undirected graph in ildeO(n4/3m1/2+n2) time (The ildeO(cdot) notation hides operatornamepolylog(n) factors). The tree is sampled from a distribution where the probability of each tree is proportional to the product of its edge weights. This improves upon the previous best algorithm due to Colbourn et al. that runs in matrix multiplication time, O(nomega). For the special case of unweighted graphs, this improves upon the best previously known running time of ildeO(minnomega,msqrtn,m4/3) for mggn5/3 (Colbourn et al. '96, Kelner-Madry '09, Madry et al. '15). The effective resistance metric is essential to our algorithm, as in the work of Madry et al., but we eschew determinant-based and random walk-based techniques used by previous algorithms. Instead, our algorithm is based on Gaussian elimination, and the fact that effective resistance is preserved in the graph resulting from eliminating a subset of vertices (called a Schur complement). As part of our algorithm, we show how to compute epsilon-approximate effective resistances for a set S of vertex pairs via approximate Schur complements in ildeO(m+(n+|S|)epsilon2) time, without using the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma which requires ildeO(min(m+|S|)epsilon2,m+nepsilon4+|S|epsilon2) time. We combine this approximation procedure with an error correction procedure for handing edges where our estimate isn't sufficiently accurate.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07451




Recommendations





Cited In (16)





This page was built for publication: Sampling random spanning trees faster than matrix multiplication

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4978019)