Upward-closed hereditary families in the dominance order
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5024680
Abstract: The majorization relation orders the degree sequences of simple graphs into posets called dominance orders. As shown by Ruch and Gutman (1979) and Merris (2002), the degree sequences of threshold and split graphs form upward-closed sets within the dominance orders they belong to, i.e., any degree sequence majorizing a split or threshold sequence must itself be split or threshold, respectively. Motivated by the fact that threshold graphs and split graphs have characterizations in terms of forbidden induced subgraphs, we define a class of graphs to be dominance monotone if whenever no realization of contains an element as an induced subgraph, and majorizes , then no realization of induces an element of . We present conditions necessary for a set of graphs to be dominance monotone, and we identify the dominance monotone sets of order at most 3.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Degree sequences and majorization
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3720966 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3598234 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3632548 (Why is no real title available?)
- Linear recognition of pseudo-split graphs
- Majorization and the number of bipartite graphs for given vertex degrees
- Realizability and uniqueness in graphs
- Split graphs
- The lattice of integer partitions
- The realization graph of a degree sequence with majorization gap 1 is Hamiltonian
- The structure of a linear chip firing game and related models
- Threshold graphs and related topics
- Weakly threshold graphs
This page was built for publication: Upward-closed hereditary families in the dominance order
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5024680)