Speed and biases of Fourier-based pricing choices: a numerical analysis

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5028604

DOI10.1080/00207160.2017.1322691zbMATH Open1499.30305arXiv1706.05935OpenAlexW3105957718MaRDI QIDQ5028604FDOQ5028604


Authors: Ricardo Crisóstomo Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 10 February 2022

Published in: International Journal of Computer Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We compare the CPU effort and pricing biases of seven Fourier-based implementations. Our analyses show that truncation and discretization errors significantly increase as we move away from the Black-Scholes-Merton framework. We rank the speed and accuracy of the competing choices, showing which methods require smaller truncation ranges and which are the most efficient in terms of sampling densities. While all implementations converge well in the Bates jump-diffusion model, Attari's formula is the only Fourier-based method that does not blow up for any Variance Gamma parameter values. In terms of speed, the use of strike vector computations significantly improves the computational burden, rendering both fast Fourier transforms (FFT) and plain delta-probability decompositions inefficient. We conclude that the multi-strike version of the COS method is notably faster than any other implementation, whereas the strike-optimized Carr Madan's formula is simultaneously faster and more accurate than the FFT, thus questioning its use.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05935




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (4)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Speed and biases of Fourier-based pricing choices: a numerical analysis

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5028604)