A remark on our paper ``negative holomorphic curvature and positive canonical bundle

From MaRDI portal
Publication:503450

DOI10.4310/CAG.2016.V24.N4.A9zbMATH Open1373.53100arXiv1609.01377WikidataQ125823828 ScholiaQ125823828MaRDI QIDQ503450FDOQ503450


Authors: Damin Wu, Shing-Tung Yau Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 12 January 2017

Published in: Communications in Analysis and Geometry (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: This is a continuation of our first paper in [WY16]. There are two purposes of this paper: One is to give a proof of the main result in [WY16] without going through the argument depending on numerical effectiveness. The other one is to provide a proof of our conjecture, mentioned in [TY], where the assumption of negative holomorphic sectional curvature is dropped to quasi-negative. We should note that a solution to our conjecture is also provided by Diverio-Trapani [DT]. Both proofs depend on our argument in [WY16]. But our argument here makes use of the argument given by the second author and Cheng in [CY75].


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.01377




Recommendations





Cited In (36)





This page was built for publication: A remark on our paper ``negative holomorphic curvature and positive canonical bundle

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q503450)