Comparative analysis of the accuracy of three different schemes in the calculation of shock waves
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5043691
Recommendations
- On convergence of finite-difference shock-capturing schemes in regions of shock waves influence
- Accuracy of MUSCL-type schemes in shock wave calculations
- On the practical accuracy of shock-capturing schemes
- To justification of the integral convergence method for studying the finite-difference schemes accuracy
- A hybrid scheme for the numerical simulation of shock/discontinuity problems
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5820030 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2132097 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3129058 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3273813 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3286571 (Why is no real title available?)
- Accuracy of MUSCL-type schemes in shock wave calculations
- Combined DG scheme that maintains increased accuracy in shock wave areas
- Compact accurately boundary-adjusting high-resolution technique for fluid dynamics
- Computational Considerations for the Simulation of Shock-Induced Sound
- Construction of high-order accurate shock-capturing finite difference schemes for unsteady shock waves
- Convergence of finite-difference schemes behind a shock front.
- Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes
- Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes
- Finite-difference approximation of the Hugoniot conditions on a shock front propagating with variable velocity
- High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws
- Higher order accurate difference solutions of fluid mechanics problems by a compact differencing technique
- Higher-order accuracy difference method for computing viscous gas flows
- Monotone finite-difference scheme preserving high accuracy in regions of shock influence
- New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection-diffusion equations
- Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws
- On the accuracy of the discontinuous Galerkin method in calculation of shock waves
- On the construction of combined finite-difference schemes of high accuracy
- On the convergence of shock-capturing difference schemes
- On the practical accuracy of shock-capturing schemes
- On the reduction of numerical dissipation in central-upwind schemes
- Semidiscrete central-upwind schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and Hamilton-Jacobi equations
- Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods
- Systems of conservation laws
- The Convergence Rate of Finite Difference Schemes in the Presence of Shocks
- Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method
- Uniformly High-Order Accurate Nonoscillatory Schemes. I
- Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes
Cited in
(7)- Combined DG scheme that maintains increased accuracy in shock wave areas
- Accuracy of MUSCL-type schemes in shock wave calculations
- On the accuracy of shock-capturing schemes calculating gas-dynamic shock waves
- Comparative analysis of the accuracy of OPENFOAM solvers for the oblique shock wave problem
- Experimental convergence rate study for three shock‐capturing schemes and development of highly accurate combined schemes
- A hybrid scheme for the numerical simulation of shock/discontinuity problems
- On the integral convergence of numerical schemes calculating gas-dynamic shock waves
This page was built for publication: Comparative analysis of the accuracy of three different schemes in the calculation of shock waves
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5043691)
