Intrinsic justifications for large-cardinal axioms

DOI10.1093/PHILMAT/NKAA038MaRDI QIDQ5067709zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Rupert McCallum

Publication date 4 April 2022

Published in Philosophia Mathematica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.8058

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Large cardinals (03E55)

Abstract: William Tait and Peter Koellner have written on the topic of which reflection principles are intrinsically justified. Phillip Welch and Sam Roberts have recently sought to motivate much stronger reflection principles. This work also had some similarities with previous work of Victoria Marshall's on reflection principles, as may be seen from considerations which we will seek to articulate in what follows. The statement of our three philosophical theses shall be given in the Introduction. We will present a set of technical results in support of three philosophical theses which will be articulated at the end of the Introduction.

Recommendations

• On reflection principles
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1873429
• Global reflection principles
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3952742
• Inner-model reflection principles

Cited in

(6)

• Global reflection principles
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1932894 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1873429 (Why is no real title available?)
• On forms of justification in set theory
• Large cardinal axioms from tameness in AECs
• Intrinsic justification for large cardinals and structural reflection

This page was built for publication: Intrinsic justifications for large-cardinal axioms

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5067709)