A new reason for doubting the Riemann hypothesis

DOI10.1080/10586458.2019.1586600MaRDI QIDQ5070641zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors

Publication date 14 April 2022

Published in Experimental Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.09740

zbMATH Keywords

Riemann hypothesisHardy's functiondistribution of zeroes

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Nonreal zeros of (zeta (s)) and (L(s, chi)); Riemann and other hypotheses (11M26)

Recommendations

• Sufficient and equivalent criteria for the Riemann hypothesis
• THE RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS IS A CONSEQUENCE OF $\mathcal{CT}$-INVARIANT QUANTUM MECHANICS
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1210345
• One computational approach in support of the Riemann hypothesis
• On Recent Strategies Proposed for Proving the Riemann Hypothesis

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3968684 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3492781 (Why is no real title available?)
• An unexpected property of odd order derivatives of Hardy’s function
• Extreme values of the Riemann zeta function
• New computations of the Riemann zeta function on the critical line
• On the Riemann zeta‐function ζ( s )—Gaps between sign changes of S ( t )
• Optimal upper bound for the maximum of the \(k\)-th derivative of Hardy's function
• The theory of Hardy's \(Z\)-function

Cited in

(4)

• Towards an Elementary Formulation of the Riemann Hypothesis in Terms of Permutation Groups
• Wronskians, cumulants, and the Riemann hypothesis
• A new reason for doubting the Riemann hypothesis
• Jensen polynomials are not a plausible route to proving the Riemann hypothesis

This page was built for publication: A new reason for doubting the Riemann hypothesis

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5070641)